Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale Research Articles

Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Versus Proton Pump Inhibitor: A Pilot Study on Comparable Efficacy in the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux-Related Cough.

Acid inhibitors have been considered in treating gastroesophageal reflux-related cough (GERC). Compared to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have more potent and durable effects on anti-acid secretion. However, whether vonoprazan and esomeprazole have different therapeutic effects on GERC remains unknown. Patients diagnosed with GERC were enrolled in our study and randomly treated with vonoprazan (20 mg, once daily, P-CAB) or esomeprazole (20 mg, twice daily, PPI) for two months. A prokinetic agent was also administered. Patients were followed up once a month. Cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) was measured as the primary outcome, while cough symptom score (CSS) and scores for cough-related quality-of-life or reflux-related symptoms were the secondary endpoints. A total of 50 patients completed the study, with 25 patients in each group. P-CAB and PPI groups showed similar decreases in cough severity VAS and CSS scores after the 2-month treatment (all P < 0.001). For quality-of-life, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score increased significantly from baseline in both groups, but the P-CAB group had greater improvement and a higher LCQ score in month 2 (all P ≤ 0.05). For reflux-related symptoms, the Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ) score declined substantially over time in the P-CAB group, while the reflux symptom index (RSI) score decreased in both groups. The P-CAB group tended to have a lower HARQ (P = 0.051) and RSI (P = 0.069) scores in month 2. In conclusion, vonoprazan may be comparable to esomeprazole in cough symptom relief in GERC during the 2-month treatment period, but possibly provides better gains on classic reflux symptoms and quality-of-life. The long-term efficacy of P-CABs on GERC may be worth further exploration. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200067089.

Burden of refractory and unexplained chronic cough on patients' lives: a cohort study.

Chronic cough (cough lasting for ≥8 weeks) can lead to significant impairment in quality of life (QoL). Using patient-reported outcomes, this cohort study assessed the perceived impact of chronic cough on QoL and everyday life in patients from outpatient hospital clinics with refractory chronic cough (RCC) or unexplained chronic cough (UCC). This was a multicentre, non-interventional survey study. Cough severity was assessed on a 0-100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Frequency, intensity and disruptiveness of cough were assessed using an adaptation of the Cough Severity Diary. The impact of cough on QoL was assessed using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). The physical impact of cough and associated impact on everyday life activities were explored using purpose-designed questions. 191 patients responded to the survey; 121 (63.4%) had RCC and 149 were women (78.0%). Mean score on the cough severity VAS was 62.9 mm. Mean LCQ total score of 11.9 indicated reduced QoL. Cough impaired patients' everyday life, including the inability to speak fluently (58.0% of patients) and feeling tired/drained (46.6%). Women perceived poorer chronic cough-related QoL than men, as reflected by lower LCQ scores, and greater impairment of physical health, including cough-related stress urinary incontinence, and psychological health. Patients with RCC/UCC experience a significant burden in their everyday life, including impaired QoL, and perceive a negative impact on physical and psychological health and everyday activities, affecting work, relationships and leisure activities. The impact appears to be greater in women than men for several of the aspects studied.

Effects of bepotastine, a nonsedating H1-antihistamine, for the treatment of persistent cough and allergic rhinitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Empirical therapy with oral histamine-1 receptor antagonists (H1RAs) is often used for patients with suspected upper airway cough syndrome. No placebo-controlled trials with nonsedating H1RAs (nsH1RAs) have evaluated validated cough outcomes. The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of an nsH1RA, bepotastine, on cough outcomes in patients with allergic rhinitis and persistent cough. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. Adult patients with persistent cough (>3 weeks in duration) and symptomatic allergic rhinitis were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either bepotastine or placebo at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was cough-specific quality of life assessed using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Secondary outcomes included cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS), throat VAS, Cough Hypersensitivity Questionnaire, Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 score and drug adverse events. Between October 2021 and September 2022, 50 participants (43 females; mean age 46.28 years; median cough duration 3 months) were assigned to either the bepotastine 10 mg twice daily or placebo group in a 1:1 ratio. After 2 weeks of treatment, both bepotastine and placebo groups showed significant improvements in the LCQ scores, but there was no significant difference in the magnitude of change between the groups (3.45±2.10 versus 3.04±2.94, p=0.576). Secondary outcomes were also comparable. Despite the relatively small sample size, our study clearly demonstrated that a 2-week treatment with bepotastine did not provide therapeutic benefits for cough outcomes. These findings suggest against the use of nsH1RAs with the intention of improving cough outcomes, even in patients with persistent cough and allergic rhinitis.

Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Refractory chronic cough (RCC) has a significant impact on patient's health-related quality of life and represents a challenge in clinical management. However, the optimal treatment for RCC remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of the current pharmacological therapeutic options for RCC. A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Ovid databases from January 1, 2008 to March 1, 2023. All randomised control trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes of efficacy or/and safety were included in the Bayesian network meta-analysis. Here, we compared the effects on Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and objective cough frequency of patients with RCC. Besides, we also compared the incidence of adverse events (AEs) for analysis of safety. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022345940. 19 eligible RCTs included 3326 patients and 7 medication categories: P2X3 antagonist, GABA modulator, Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) modulator, NK-1 agonist, opioid analgesic, macrolide, and sodium cromoglicate. Compared with placebo, mean difference (MD) of LCQ and 24 h cough frequency for P2X3 antagonist relief were 1.637 (95% CI: 0.887-2.387) and-11.042 (P=0.035). Compared with placebo, effect sizes (MD for LCQ and cough severity VAS) for GABA modulator were 1.347 (P=0.003) and-7.843 (P=0.003). In the network meta-analysis, gefapixant is the most effective treatment for patients with RCC (The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curves (SUCRA) is 0.711 in LCQ, 0.983 in 24 h cough frequency, and 0.786 in cough severity VAS). Lesogaberan had better efficacy than placebo (SUCRA: 0.632 vs. 0.472) in 24 h cough frequency. Eliapixant and lesogaberan had better efficacy than placebo in cough severity VAS. However, TRP modulator had worse efficacy than placebo. In the meta-analysis of AEs, the present study found P2X3 antagonist had a significant correlation to AEs (RR: 1.129, 95% CI: 1.012-1.259), especially taste-related AEs (RR: 6.216, P<0.05). In this network meta-analysis, P2X3 antagonist showing advantages in terms of efficacy is currently the most promising medication for treatment of RCC. GABA modulator also showed potential efficacy for RCC but with AEs of the central system. Nevertheless, the role of TRP modulator needed to be revisited. Further research is needed to determine the potential beneficiary population for optimizing the pharmacological management of chronic cough. National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870079), Guangdong Science and Technology Project (2021A050520012), Incubation Program of National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (GMU2020-207).

Methods of Objectifying Cough

Abstract Cough is one of the most common symptoms encountered by clinicians. Attempts to measure cough date back to early 1950s and since then, significant progress has been made in understanding cough and many methods have been developed. Methods for cough measurement can be divided into subjective and objective methods and further according to the aspect of cough they assess. Subjective methods for cough assessment provide us with information about patient’s personal experiences of cough and about psychosocial aspect of cough. Most widely used subjective methods include cough severity visual analogue scale, cough severity diaries, and various quality of life questionnaires. Objective methods for cough assessment focus mainly on cough frequency and on cough reflex sensitivity. Most widely used methods from this group include cough monitors and cough inhalation challenges. This review focuses on the most widely used cough measurement methods and points out their advantages and limitations for use in research and clinical practice. The ability to measure cough in clinical and research conditions could be used to determine treatment outcomes, to test new therapies, and to further study pathophysiology and physiology of cough.

Cough Characteristics and Healthcare Journeys of Chronic Cough Patients in Community-Based Populations in South Korea and Taiwan

PurposeThis study aimed to understand the cough characteristics and health journeys among community-based chronic cough (CC) patients, and their characteristics associated with healthcare visits.MethodsA population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 2020, using the South Korea and Taiwan National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) and CC surveys. Patients with current CC were defined by daily coughing for > 8 weeks in the past 12 months and currently coughing at the time of survey. The survey items pertained to CC patients’ treatment journey and cough characteristics.ResultsPatients with current CC in South Korea and Taiwan, respectively, had cough duration for 3.45 ± 5.13 years and 5.75 ± 7.28 years and cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of 4.50 ± 2.15 and 4.46 ± 1.92 out of 0–10 scale, with 70.3% and 57.9% having spoken with a physician about cough. Compared to CC patients who had not visited healthcare professionals for cough, those who visited reported more severe cough (VAS: 3.89 ± 1.71 vs. 4.6 ± 2.02; p = 0.009), worse cough-specific quality of life (Leicester Cough Questionnaire: 16.20 ± 3.23 vs.13.45 ± 2.68, p < 0.001), greater symptom severity (Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire: 16.73 ± 15.16 vs. 24.57 ± 13.38; p < 0.001), and more urinary incontinence (13.6 vs. 26.5%, p = 0.027). More than 50% of patients perceived cough medication(s) as not or a little useful and 25% felt their physicians did not well understand how CC impacts their life.ConclusionCough is frequently severe and persistent among community-based CC patients. They experience several issues in their health journey, including treatment ineffectiveness and physician’s understanding. Further efforts are warranted to reduce CC burden in the community.

Healthcare utilization and costs in chronic cough

Background Chronic cough is a common reason for medical consultations and is associated with considerable physical and psychological morbidity. This study investigated healthcare use and cost in chronic cough and assessed its relationship with cough severity, health status, objective cough frequency (CF), and anxiety and depression. Methods This was a prospective study of consecutive patients with chronic cough from a specialist clinic who completed a cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS), cough-specific health status (Leicester Cough Questionnaire; LCQ) and general health status EuroQol EQ-5D-5L, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), and 24-hour objective CF monitoring with Leicester Cough Monitor (LCM). Case notes were reviewed for cough-specific healthcare use 12 months before and after the first cough clinic consultation. Resource use included general practitioner and hospital clinic visits, investigations, and treatments. Unit costs for healthcare use were derived predominantly from National Health Service Reference Costs. Results One hundred participants with chronic cough were recruited (69% female, median duration 3 years, mean age 58 years). The diagnoses of cough were unexplained (57%), refractory (27%), and other (16%). Cough severity, health status, and CF were: median (IQR) VAS = 59.5 (30–79) mm, mean (SD) LCQ = 11.9 (4.0), mean (SD) EQ-5D-5L = 0.846 (0.178), and geometric mean (SD) CF = 15.3 (2.5) coughs/hr, respectively. The mean (SD) total cost per individual for cough-related healthcare utilization was £1,663 (747). Diagnostic investigations were the largest contributor to cost (63%), followed by cough clinic consultations (25%). In multivariate analysis, anxiety (GAD7) and cough-related health status (LCQ) were associated with increased cost (p ≤.001 and .037). Conclusion Healthcare cost associated with chronic cough are largely due to diagnostic investigations and clinic consultations. The predictors of costs were health status (LCQ) and anxiety. Further studies should investigate the optimal management protocols for patients with chronic cough.

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Gummy Formulation for the Management of Cough in Adults: Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

The cough is one of the most common medical complaints affecting the general population. It is well known that persisting cough negatively affects subjects’ quality of life (QoL) and sleep quality. The aim of the current double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study was to assess the effectiveness of a novel medical device in gummy format in reducing cough and improving QoL in adult subjects with acute persisting cough. Forty subjects were enrolled and randomized into two arms according to the treatment. Both the investigational product (IP) and placebo were administered orally, three times per day for 10 consecutive days. Cough symptoms and severity were measured by the Cough Clinical Score (CCS) consisting of a 6-point Likert scale, Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS). QoL was rated using the SF-36 (short form) questionnaire. Significant improvements were seen both in the daytime and nighttime cough score after 5 days and at the end of treatment in the IP group but not in those subjects taking the placebo. QoL and sleep disturbances were ameliorated significantly in the IP group only. In conclusion, IP was found safe, well-tolerated and effective in the management of persisting cough in adults.

Efficacy and safety of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough (COUGH-1 and COUGH-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials

Gefapixant is an oral P2X3 receptor antagonist that has previously shown efficacy and safety in refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough. We therefore aim to confirm the efficacy and safety of gefapixant in participants with refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough. COUGH-1 and COUGH-2 were both double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. COUGH-1 was done in 156 sites in 17 countries and COUGH-2 in 175 sites in 20 countries. We enrolled participants who were 18 years or older with a diagnosis of refractory chronic cough or unexplained chronic cough of 1 year duration or more. Participants were also required to have a cough severity visual analogue scale score of 40 mm or more at screening and baseline. Eligible participants were randomly allocated (1:1:1), using a computer-generated allocation schedule, to one of three treatment groups: placebo, gefapixant 15 mg twice per day, or gefapixant 45 mg twice per day. All study treatments were given orally. Participants were treated over a 12-week main study period in COUGH-1 and a 24-week main study period in COUGH-2; followed by extension periods for a total of up to 52 weeks of treatment in both trials. The primary outcome was placebo-adjusted mean change in 24-h cough frequency at 12 weeks in COUGH-1 and 24 weeks in COUGH-2. Both studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03449134 (COUGH-1) and NCT03449147 (COUGH-2). From March 14, 2018, (first participant screened) to July 26, 2019, (last participant screened) 732 patients were recruited in COUGH-1 and 1317 in COUGH-2. COUGH-1 randomly assigned and treated 730 participants (243 [33×3%] with placebo, 244 [33×4%] with gefapixant 15 mg twice per day, and 243 [33×3%] with gefapixant 45 mg twice per day); COUGH-2 randomly assigned and treated 1314 participants (435 [33×1%] with placebo, 440 [33×5%] with gefapixant 15 mg twice per day, and 439 [33×4%] with gefapixant 45 mg twice per day). Participants were mostly female (542 [74×2%] of 730 in COUGH-1 and 984 [74×9%] of 1314 in COUGH-2). The mean age was 59×0 years (SD 12×6) in COUGH-1 and 58×1 years (12×1) in COUGH-2, and the mean cough duration was 11·6 years (SD 9·5) in COUGH-1 and 11·2 years (9·8) in COUGH-2. Gefapixant 45 mg twice per day showed significant reductions in 24-h cough frequency compared with placebo at week 12 in COUGH-1 (18·5% [95% CI 32·9-0·9]; p=0·041) and at week 24 in COUGH-2 (14·6% [26·1-1·4]; p=0·031). Gefapixant 15 mg twice per day did not show a significant reduction in cough frequency versus placebo in both studies. The most common adverse events were related to taste disturbance: ageusia (36 [4·9%] of 730 in COUGH-1 and 86 [6·5%] of 1314 in COUGH-2), dysgeusia (118 [16·2%] in COUGH-1 and 277 [21·1%] in COUGH-2), hypergeusia (3 [0·4%] in COUGH-1 and 6 [0×5%] in COUGH-2), hypogeusia (19 [2·6%] in COUGH-1 and 80 [6·1%] in COUGH-2), and taste disorder (28 [3·8%] in COUGH-1 and 46 [3·5%] in COUGH-2). Gefapixant 45 mg twice per day is the first treatment to show efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in phase 3 clinical trials for refractory chronic cough or unexplained chronic cough. Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Leicester Cough Questionnaire validation and clinically important thresholds for change in refractory or unexplained chronic cough.

Introduction:The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), a cough-specific quality-of-life measure, evaluates the impact of cough across physical, psychological, and social domains in patients with chronic cough (CC). This study assessed the psychometric properties of the LCQ.Methods:Data from a phase IIb, randomized controlled trial of the P2X3-receptor antagonist gefapixant were analyzed (NCT02612610). Subjective [Cough Severity Diary, cough severity visual analogue scale, and patient global impression of change (PGIC)] and objective (awake and 24-h cough frequency) data were used to validate the LCQ for use in patients with refractory or unexplained CC (RCC and UCC, respectively). Psychometric analyses included confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency and test–retest reliability, validity, responsiveness, and estimated within-patient thresholds for clinically meaningful change.Results:Model-fit values for the proposed three-factor LCQ domains and most individual items were acceptable. Analyses suggest that a mean improvement ranging from 1.3 to 2.3 points for the LCQ total and ⩾0.8, ⩾0.9, and ⩾0.8 points for physical, psychological, and social domain scores, respectively, had the best sensitivity and/or specificity for predicting patient ratings of improvement on the PGIC.Conclusions:The LCQ is a valid and reliable measure to evaluate cough-specific quality of life and is a fit-for-purpose measure for use in patients with RCC or UCC. Although a single threshold for defining clinically meaningful change depends on the context of use, the results can help guide both treatment decisions and drug development. Therefore, clinicians may consider a ⩾1.3-point increase in the LCQ total score as clinically meaningful.

Effectiveness and tolerability of the thyme/ivy herbal fluid extract BNO 1200 for the treatment of acute cough: an observational pharmacy-based study

Objective Efficacy and safety of an oral thyme/ivy syrup for the treatment of acute cough was previously demonstrated in a randomized clinical trial. Here, we present real-life data from a pharmacy-based, observational study on the effectiveness and tolerability of another thyme/ivy combination (BNO 1200, Bronchipret drops). Methods This observational, prospective, uncontrolled study was conducted in 305 German pharmacies. Cough and associated symptoms, cough severity and health related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed at baseline, after 4 days and at individual end of treatment (EoT) in patients with acute cough due to upper respiratory tract infections who bought BNO 1200. Patients took BNO 1200 until resolution of cough and completed three validated questionnaires: patient-adapted Bronchitis Severity Score (BSS), cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ-acute). They also rated speed of onset of treatment action on a VAS and tolerability. Results A total of 749 patients participated in the study; 730 were included in the analysis. Mean treatment duration was 7.0 ± 3.6 days. Symptom severity assessed by BSS improved from 8.7 ± 3.8 score points (baseline) to 2.4 ± 2.6 at EoT (p < .0001). Clinically relevant improvements (MCID = 17 mm) in cough severity were reported by 87.2% of patients at EoT. HRQoL improved significantly (12.2 ± 3.3 points at baseline vs. 18.5 ± 2.7 at EoT; p < .0001), exceeding the MCID (=2 points) in 90.0% of patients. Tolerability was rated “good” or “very good” by 98.0% of patients. No adverse drug reactions were reported. Conclusion Patients with acute cough taking BNO 1200 had a significant reduction in BSS, cough severity and improvement in HRQoL confirming RCT data with the syrup formulation. BNO 1200 was well tolerated.

Chronic cough is associated with increased reporting of autonomic symptoms.

BackgroundPatients with some neuronal hypersensitivity syndromes experience increased autonomic symptoms. Chronic cough is thought to be a neuronal hypersensitivity disorder and, therefore, may be associated with increased autonomic symptoms.Methods96 chronic cough subjects were recruited from the tertiary cough clinic based at Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK; 76 healthy controls were also recruited. Subjects were aged >18 years. Those with significant respiratory disease, significant smoking history or taking medication known to affect cough or autonomic function were excluded. Subjects completed the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS) 31 autonomic symptom questionnaire, the Cough Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ) and a cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS).Results96 chronic cough subjects and 76 healthy volunteers were included in the final analysis. Mann–Whitney U-tests comparing COMPASS 31 scores in both groups showed that the total COMPASS 31 score was significantly higher in the patient group (median 18.4, interquartile range (IQR) 7.5–32.0) than the control group (median 3.6, IQR 1.1–9.5; p<0.001). The chronic cough subjects had significantly higher symptom scores than the healthy volunteer groups in all domains (p≤0.001) except vasomotor symptoms (p=0.770). There was a positive association between COMPASS 31 and CQLQ in the patient group (p<0.001, r=0.432) but not COMPASS 31 and VAS (p=0.227).InterpretationChronic cough patients do indeed report more frequent and severe autonomic symptoms than healthy volunteers, indicating that this population may suffer from dysautonomia. At present, it remains unclear whether this occurs as a result of the cough or whether both the cough and dysfunction are part of some wider vagal pathology.

Design and rationale of two phase 3 randomised controlled trials (COUGH-1 and COUGH-2) of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in refractory or unexplained chronic cough

BackgroundWe present study designs, dose selection and preliminary patient characteristics from two phase 3 clinical trials of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in refractory chronic cough (RCC) or unexplained chronic cough (UCC).MethodsCOUGH-1 (NCT03449134) and COUGH-2 (NCT03449147) are randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trials in subjects with RCC or UCC (age ≥18 years; cough duration ≥1 year; Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale score ≥40 mm). The primary efficacy study periods are 12 weeks (40-week extension; COUGH-1) and 24 weeks (28-week extension; COUGH-2). Interventions include placebo, gefapixant 15 mg and gefapixant 45 mg (1:1:1 ratio). The primary efficacy endpoints are average 24-h cough frequency at Week 12 (COUGH-1) and Week 24 (COUGH-2). Awake cough frequency, patient-reported outcomes and responder analyses are secondary endpoints.ResultsThe doses of 45 mg (to provide maximal efficacy and acceptable tolerability) and 15 mg (to provide acceptable efficacy and improved tolerability) were selected based on phase 1 and 2 studies. In COUGH-1, 730 participants have been randomised and treated; 74% are female with mean age of 59 years (39% over 65 years), and mean baseline duration of cough of 11.5 years. In COUGH-2, 1314 participants have been randomised and treated; 75% are female with mean age of 58 years (33% over 65 years), and mean baseline duration of cough of 11.1 years.ConclusionsThese global studies include participants with baseline characteristics consistent with previous RCC and UCC studies and will inform the efficacy and safety profile of gefapixant in the treatment of patients with RCC and UCC.

Gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b trial

Gefapixant is a P2X3 receptor antagonist that has shown promise for the treatment of refractory and unexplained chronic cough. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gefapixant compared with placebo after 12 weeks of treatment for refractory chronic cough or unexplained chronic cough. We did a 12-week, phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with refractory chronic cough or unexplained chronic cough aged 18-80 years who were recruited from 44 primarily outpatient pulmonologist or allergist sites in the UK and the USA. Eligible patients had refractory or unexplained chronic cough lasting 1 year or longer, no radiographic chest abnormality, and 40 mm or more on a 100-mm cough severity visual analogue scale at enrolment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or one of three doses (7·5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg) of oral gefapixant twice daily, every day, for 84 days; visits to investigative sites were on days 1, 28, 42, 56, 70, 84, and 85. The randomisation schedule was computer generated using a permuted block algorithm by Advance Research Associates (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Patients and all personnel involved in the conduct and interpretation of the study were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was placebo-adjusted change from baseline in awake cough frequency after 12 weeks, assessed in the full analysis set, which is a subset of the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events were monitored and safety was evaluated in all patients receiving one or more doses of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02612610. Between Dec 21, 2015, and July 26, 2016, 253 patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=63), gefapixant 7·5 mg (n=64), gefapixant 20 mg (n=63), or gefapixant 50 mg (n=63) twice daily. The mean age of patients was 60·2 (SD 9·9) years and 193 (76%) were women. At 12 weeks, patients' geometric mean awake cough frequency was 18·2 coughs per h (geometric SD 3·1) with placebo, and 14·5 coughs per h (3·7) with 7·5 mg, 12·0 coughs per h (4·2) with 20 mg, and 11·3 coughs per h (2·8) with 50 mg gefapixant. Estimated percentage change relative to placebo was -22·0% (-41·8 to 4·6; p=0·097) with 7·5 mg, -22·2% (-42·0 to 4·3; p=0·093) with 20 mg, and -37·0% (95% CI -53·3 to -14·9; p=0·0027) with 50 mg gefapixant. Dysgeusia was the most common adverse event, occurring in three (5%) patients given placebo, six (10%) given 7·5 mg gefapixant, 21 (33%) given 20 mg gefapixant, and 30 (48%) given 50 mg gefapixant. Targeting purinergic receptor P2X3 with gefapixant at a dose of 50 mg twice daily significantly reduced cough frequency in patients with refractory chronic cough or unexplained chronic cough after 12 weeks of treatment compared with placebo. Further development of gefapixant is warranted for the treatment of chronic cough. Afferent Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA).

Gefapixant in two randomised dose-escalation studies in chronic cough.

Gefapixant has previously demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of refractory chronic cough at a high daily dose. The current investigations explore efficacy and tolerability of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of chronic cough using a dose-escalation approach. Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-escalation studies recruited participants with refractory chronic cough. Patients were assigned to receive ascending doses of gefapixant (study 1: 50-200 mg, study 2: 7.5-50 mg) or placebo for 16 days, then crossed-over after washout. The primary end-point was awake cough frequency assessed using a 24-h ambulatory cough monitor at baseline and on day 4 of each dose. Patient-reported outcomes included a cough severity visual analogue scale and the cough severity diary. In clinical studies, gefapixant doses ≥30 mg produced maximal improvements in cough frequency compared with placebo (p<0.05); reported cough severity measures improved at similar doses. Taste disturbance exhibited a different relationship with dose, apparently maximal at doses ≥150 mg. P2X3 antagonism with gefapixant demonstrates anti-tussive efficacy and improved tolerability at lower doses than previously investigated. Studies of longer duration are warranted.

Quantitative measurement properties and score interpretation of the Cough Severity Diary in patients with chronic cough.

Aims:The Cough Severity Diary (CSD) was developed in accordance with the FDA guidance for patient-reported outcome measures and is focused on capturing the patient’s perception of cough in terms of frequency, intensity, and disruption due to their cough. The measure includes a series of seven items asking patients to rate the frequency (three items), intensity (two items), and disruptiveness (two items) of their cough. The instrument was designed to be completed daily before bedtime, has a recall period of ‘today,’ and responses to items are entered on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10 with anchors on each end. The objective of this analysis was to confirm the domain structure of the CSD and assess its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in adult patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC/UCC). Criteria for defining meaningful changes in mean weekly CSD total and domain scores in the context of a clinical trial were also developed.Methods:Pooled data from a phase II randomized controlled trial of an investigational treatment for RCC/UCC were analyzed. Participants were non-smokers, had RCC/UCC for ⩾1 year, and a baseline cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) ⩾40 mm. CSD scores (baseline, week 4), were analyzed; the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), cough severity VAS, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and objective cough frequency counts were used for validation. CSD domain structure (Total, Frequency, Intensity, Disruption) was assessed for scoring.Results:A total of 253 participants were included (mean age 60.2; 76% female). Global fit of the three-factor CSD was acceptable. For the CSD total score, internal consistency (α = 0.89) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.68) were high. CSD total scores were correlated with the LCQ total (r = –0.62) and cough severity VAS (r = 0.84). Participants with a PGIC score of 1 or 2 (most improved groups) had the greatest mean score improvement on the CSD Total (Day 0 to Day 28), supporting responsiveness (similar findings for subscales). A change threshold of ⩾1.3-point reduction on the total and subscale scores is appropriate to define clinically meaningful improvement.Conclusion:The CSD is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of cough symptom severity in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough and fit-for-purpose for assessing changes in cough severity in clinical trials. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentin in the Treatment of Chronic Cough: A Systematic Review.

Despite recent clinical guidelines, the optimal therapeutic strategy for the management of refractory chronic cough is still a challenge. The present systematic review was designed to assess the evidence for efficacy and safety of gabapentin in the treatment of chronic cough. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and publications cited in bibliographies was performed. Articles were searched by two reviewers with a priori criteria for study selection. Seven relevant articles were identified, including two randomized controlled trials, one prospective case-series designed with consecutive patients, one retrospective case series of consecutive patients, one retrospective case series with unknown consecutive status, and two case reports comprising six and two patients, respectively. Improvements were detected in cough-specific quality of life (Leicester Cough Questionnaire score) and cough severity (visual analogue scale score) following gabapentin treatment in randomized controlled trials. The results of prospective case-series showed that the rate of overall improvement of cough and sensory neuropathy with gabapentin was 68%. Gabapentin treatment of patients with chronic cough showed superior efficacy and a good safety record compared with placebo or standard medications. Additional randomized and controlled trials are needed.

Rococo study: a real-world evaluation of an over-the-counter medicine in acute cough (a multicentre, randomised, controlled study)

ObjectivesTo investigate the efficacy and safety of CS1002, an over-the-counter cough treatment containing diphenhydramine, ammonium chloride and levomenthol in a cocoa-based demulcent.DesignA multicentre, randomised, parallel group, controlled, single-blinded study in...

Chronic cough and a normal chest X-ray - a simple systematic approach to exclude common causes before referral to secondary care: a retrospective cohort study.

Chronic cough is common in the community and can cause significant morbidity. It is not clear how closely treatment guidelines are used in general practice, or how often specialist referral is indicated. We aimed to assess the management of chronic cough in primary care before referral to a cough clinic, and to assess the outcome of managing chronic cough with an approach of simple investigation and empirical treatment trials. Data were extracted from the records of all patients attending a district general hospital respiratory clinic over a two-year period with isolated chronic cough lasting ⩾8 weeks. The clinic assessed symptoms with a cough-severity visual analogue scale and the Leicester Cough Questionnaire. Among 266 patients, the most frequent diagnoses were asthma (29%), gastro-oesophageal reflux (22%) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use (14%). In all, 12% had unexplained chronic cough. Common diagnoses had often not been excluded in primary care: only 21% had undergone spirometry, 86% had undergone chest radiography and attempts to exclude asthma with corticosteroids had been made only in 39%. In the clinic few investigations were conducted that were not available in primary care. Substantial improvements in symptoms occurred with a median (interquartile range) total of 2 (2–3) clinic visits. We estimated that 87% of patients could have been managed solely in primary care; we did not identify distinguishing characteristics among this group. Most cases of chronic cough referred to secondary care could be managed with a simple and systematic approach, which is potentially transferrable to a community setting.

The prevalence of cough in lung cancer: Its characteristics and predictors.

162 Background: Cough commonly affects patients with LC but quoted prevalence figures vary and most were obtained before advances in anticancer treatment for LC. This study aimed to determine its prevalence and characteristics (severity, impact and potential predictors) in patients undergoing standard treatment and follow up. Methods: Consecutive LC patients attending clinics at The Christie Hospital, UK during a predefined 5 week period were asked whether they had a cough and invited to participate in its further evaluation according to an ethically approved protocol. Demographic, cancer and cancer treatment data were collected in all. Patients with a cough also completed subjective assessments using the validated cough impact Manchester cough in LC scale (MCLCS) and cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS). Standard statistical tests were used for analysis with significance (p&lt;0.05). Results: Of 223 consecutive LC outpatients approached, the prevalence of cough was 57% (128/223); 202/223 (86%) consented to further data collection (study population) and of these 115 (57%) reported cough. The majority (60/115, 52%) felt that their cough warranted treatment and 23% reported their cough to be painful (26/115). The median VAS score (n=115) was 32mm (25th-75th IQR 20-51, range 0-100, high scores = worse cough severity). The median MCLCS score (n=113) was 22 (25th-75th IQR 16-27, range 1-50, high scores = worse cough impact). There was no significant difference between coughers and non-coughers with respect to age, sex, co-morbidities, smoking, performance status, treatment intent, treatment type, reasons for not receiving treatment, stage and histology. The proportion of non-coughers was lower among patients receiving anticancer therapy (45/115 39% vs 47/87 54%, p=0.04) in univariate analysis. Conclusions: Cough is present in the majority of LC patients, even in those undergoing treatment. Many patients feel that it warrants treatment. Whilst many consider factors such smoking, stage, histology and cancer treatment type to be important determinants of the presence of cough, our data does not reflect this. Improving LC related cough requires more than better cancer therapies.